Restaurant Loyalty Program ROI: The Data You Should Know in 2027

Restaurant loyalty programs deliver an average ROI of 4.8x to 5.3x program cost, with members visiting 20% more frequently and spending 38% more per visit than non-members. The most critical performance window is the 90 days after enrollment, where the trajectory from sign-up to regular is either established or lost. Brands that move members to a fourth visit within that window see a 95% likelihood of long-term retention.

Intro

Most restaurant operators running a loyalty program have a gut sense that it's working. Members seem to visit more. The birthday campaign gets good engagement.

The win-back push pulls some lapsed guests back. But "seems to be working" is not a business case, and it won't hold up when someone asks what the program is actually returning on the investment.

This guide is built for that question. It pulls together current benchmark data from the 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report, Antavo's Global Customer Loyalty Report 2026, Circana's traffic analysis, and several other recent research sources to give operators a factual, sourced picture of what loyalty programs actually return, which metrics matter most, what benchmarks look like across restaurant segments, and where programs typically lose value without operators realizing it.

Paytronix's 2026 Loyalty Report draws on data from more than 800 client brands and 225 million guest profiles, making it one of the most comprehensive data sources available on restaurant loyalty performance. The findings throughout this article reference that report directly, alongside independent industry sources, to give a complete and objective picture.

In This Guide

• The current state of restaurant loyalty: market adoption and traffic share
• The core ROI metrics every operator should track
• Spend lift and visit frequency: what the data actually shows
• Active rate benchmarks by restaurant segment (2026 data)
• The Fourth Visit Principle and what it means for program design
• How to calculate ROI for your specific program
• Where loyalty programs lose value and how to fix it
• What separates high-performing programs from average ones
• Answers to the eight most common questions about loyalty ROI

The State of Restaurant Loyalty Today

Before getting into ROI mechanics, it helps to understand where the market stands.

39% of restaurant visits in the United States now come from loyalty program members, a figure drawn from Circana and Nation's Restaurant News data published in 2025 and 2026 that has roughly doubled since 2019. Loyalty is no longer a differentiator in most restaurant categories; it's table stakes. The question has shifted from whether to have a program to what kind of program actually produces results.

67% of all restaurants have launched loyalty programs, with 68% of full-service restaurants and 71% of quick-service restaurants offering one. Among QSR customers specifically, 52% belong to at least one restaurant loyalty program, per QSR Magazine data. That majority participation rate in the segment with the highest visit frequency changes the math for operators who haven't launched yet: you are competing against a loyalty program every time a guest chooses where to eat, whether you have one or not.

76% of limited-service restaurants registered an increase in traffic in 2024 driven by their loyalty program, per Nation's Restaurant News. And in a period when overall restaurant traffic was declining, loyalty program members continued showing up at a higher rate than non-members. That traffic resilience during a soft period is one of the most commercially significant arguments for loyalty investment, and it rarely gets the attention it deserves.

The loyalty market itself reflects the demand. The global loyalty management market was estimated at $12.9 billion in 2025, projected to reach $20.36 billion by 2030, a 9.6% compound annual growth rate.

The Core ROI Numbers

What the Overall Return Looks Like

92.7% of loyalty program owners report positive ROI, with an average return of 5.3x, according to Antavo's Global Customer Loyalty Report 2026. A separate Restroworks analysis puts the figure at 90% of operators reporting positive ROI, with an average at 4.8x. Across both datasets, the consistent finding is that the vast majority of programs return meaningful positive value, and the average program returns between $4.80 and $5.30 for every $1 invested.

Those averages obscure significant variance. First-year loyalty programs boost average order values by 8 to 12%, while established programs running three or more years show a 15 to 25% increase in average order value. A program in its first year is not yet performing at its ceiling, and operators who abandon programs before the 18-month mark frequently do so before seeing the compounding returns that come from program maturity.

Spend Lift: What Loyalty Members Actually Spend

The spend differential between loyalty members and non-members is the most direct metric in the ROI calculation.

Paytronix platform data shows loyalty members spend 38% more per visit than non-members. Circana's independent analysis confirms the direction: members visit 22% more often and spend 38% more per visit, a combination that compounds dramatically over a guest's lifetime.

To see the math: if your average guest spends $25 per visit and visits 1.5 times per month, they generate $450 annually. A loyalty member with a 38% spend lift and 22% frequency lift generates roughly $681 annually from the same baseline. That $231 annual difference, multiplied across thousands of enrolled members, is the revenue engine loyalty programs create.

Customers enrolled in loyalty programs spend an average of 32% more annually than non-members at the same restaurant, and the effect strengthens over time. Loyalty members are also 31% less likely to switch to a competitor based on price alone, a competitive buffer that matters significantly in a market where one-third of diners changed their favorite QSR or fast casual brand in the past year.

Visit Frequency Lift

47% of loyalty members engage with restaurant programs weekly, up from 34% in 2023. That increasing engagement rate signals a shift in how guests relate to loyalty programs: they are no longer an occasional perk but a regular part of the dining decision.

Sweetgreen's experience after simplifying its SG Rewards program in April 2025 is instructive. After replacing a complicated tiered system with a straightforward points structure, loyalty members visited 2x as often as digital-only customers, per the company's Q2 2025 earnings call.

The program design change alone, without any fundamental shift in reward value, produced a doubling of visit frequency among members. Complexity was the constraint. Simplicity unlocked the behavior.

Active Rate Benchmarks by Restaurant Segment (2026 Data)

Active rate is the percentage of enrolled loyalty members who have made at least one qualifying visit within a defined window, typically 90 days. It is the most important health metric for a loyalty program because it measures whether enrolled members are actually engaged, not just registered.

The 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report evaluated active rates across nine restaurant and c-store concepts, drawing on data from 800+ brands and 225 million guest profiles. The findings reveal sharp differences by segment.

Active Rate Results by Segment (2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report)

Segment	2025 Active Rate	Year-Over-Year Change	Key Finding
Beverage and Snack	66–72%	+18% (snack concepts specifically)	Snack had the breakout year, nearly doubling its share of high-engagement members
Specialty	66–72%	Held or improved	Frequency advantage maintained despite economic pressure
Sandwich and Mexican	66–72%	Held or improved	Strong program designs driving consistent engagement
Family Dining	Flat	Flat	Holding flat is its own win given low visit frequency
Casual Dining	Below 50% (first time)	Declined	Programs enrolling members but not giving them a reason to return
Bar and Grill	Significant drop	-13%	Nearly 3 in 4 new members never returned within 90 days
Gasoline and C-store	Declined	-22 points	Rapid enrollment outpaced onboarding; total membership grew 1.5M+

 

Source: Paytronix 2026 Loyalty Report. Active rate = members with at least one qualifying visit in 90 days.

The through line across all nine segments is the same challenge in different forms. Signing people up is only half the job. The 90-day window after enrollment is where loyalty is either built or lost, and the gap between "joined a program" and "became a regular" remains the most consequential in any program's key performance indicators (KPIs).

The gasoline and c-store finding is worth unpacking in detail because it looks alarming at first glance. A 22-point drop in active rate alongside 1.5 million new members is not a sign of program failure. It is a sign of enrollment growth that outpaced activation strategy. The members are there. The programs haven't yet built the onboarding experiences to convert them into regulars quickly enough.

Casual dining's dip below 50% active rate for the first time is a more structural concern. Programs in this segment are enrolling members but not yet giving them a compelling enough reason to return, signaling that the loyalty program design or early engagement experience needs attention.

The Fourth Visit Principle: Where Regular Guests are Made

The single most important finding in the 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report is not a number; it's a threshold.

First-time guests return less than half the time. But once a member completes four visits, the return rate climbs to 95%.

That inflection point changes how the entire ROI calculation works.

If you treat enrollment as the goal of your loyalty program, you are optimizing for a metric that doesn't predict long-term value. A guest who enrolled and visited once generated a data record and nothing else. A guest who visited four times is, with 95% probability, a regular customer who will continue generating revenue without intervention.

As our 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report states directly: "Your loyalty program isn't just a nice-to-have anymore, it's practically your revenue engine. If your loyalty program can move your repeat rate from 30% to 40%, you've fundamentally changed your business economics."

The implication for program design is concrete. Every campaign, every onboarding message, every milestone reward should be evaluated against one question: does this accelerate a new member toward their fourth visit?

Welcome sequences that drive a second visit. Double-points bonuses at visit three.

A meaningful reward unlocking at visit four. Not because four is a magic number, but because reaching it is the boundary between a guest who might return and a guest who will.

Most programs are designed around what happens after a guest is already a regular. The programs producing the highest active rates in 2026 are designed around what happens in the first 90 days before a guest becomes one.

How to Calculate Your Program's ROI

ROI measurement for loyalty programs fails most often because operators don't use a holdout group. Without one, you cannot distinguish between visits your program drove and visits that would have happened anyway.

The correct method has four steps:

1. Establish your holdout group. When a campaign goes out, hold back 10 to 15% of the qualifying audience and send them nothing. This group is your control. Their visit rate during the campaign period is your baseline.
2. Measure incremental visits. Compare the visit rate of the campaign group to the holdout group during the campaign window. The difference is the incremental lift attributable to the campaign.
3. Calculate revenue impact. Multiply the incremental visits by your average check. This is the revenue the campaign generated above the baseline.
4. Compare against campaign cost. Subtract the cost of the offer (discounts, free items) and the cost of the messaging from the incremental revenue. The remainder is net program ROI for that campaign.

Without step one, everything else is correlation. A 15% response rate sounds good until you find out that 12% of non-recipients also visited during the same period. The actual campaign lift was 3 percentage points, not 15. That difference completely changes the economics of the offer.

The Three Metrics Every Operator Should Track Monthly

1. Visit frequency: enrolled vs. non-enrolled. This is the most direct behavioral measure. If your enrolled members visit at the same rate as non-enrolled guests, the program is not changing behavior. The incentive structure, the reward value, or the communication frequency needs attention.
2. Average check: enrolled vs. non-enrolled. Loyalty members who feel recognized tend to order differently. They try new items, add sides, skip the mental ceiling they put on their total. If your enrolled members spend the same per visit as non-enrolled guests, the program is not generating the spend lift that makes it financially justifiable.
3. 90-day active rate. What percentage of members enrolled in the past 90 days have visited at least once? This is your leading indicator of program health. If new members are not activating within 90 days, they are almost certainly not coming back. Fix the onboarding before optimizing anything else.

Where Loyalty Programs Lose Value

72% of loyalty programs fail, typically due to overly complicated rules, rewards that take too long to earn, no staff training, and ignoring non-loyalty customers. The failures are mostly structural, not random, and they follow consistent patterns:

• Making the reward too distant. A points system where $1 spent earns 1 point and a free entrée costs 500 points is technically functioning but practically broken. Guests calculate the distance to the reward, decide it's not worth changing their behavior for, and the enrollment becomes a dormant record. The reward has to feel achievable within a reasonable number of visits at a typical check size for your concept.
• Treating enrollment as the finish line. "The 90-day window after signup is where loyalty is either built or lost," according to the 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report. A program that celebrates enrollment numbers but has no structured onboarding experience for new members is measuring the wrong thing. Enrollment is the beginning of the work, not the result.
• Rewarding with discounts by default. Discounts train guests to wait for an offer rather than visiting at full price. Over time, a discount-heavy program shifts the guest relationship from one built on brand preference to one built on deal-seeking. The most effective programs lead with access, recognition, and experiences. Discounts are one tool in a larger toolkit, not the default response to every behavioral trigger.
• Sending the same message to every guest. Restaurants using AI-powered personalization see up to 35% higher redemption rates compared to traditional segmentation methods. A win-back campaign that offers every lapsed guest the same 20% discount sends a different message to a guest who hasn't visited in 30 days than to one who hasn't visited in 90 days. Segmentation that distinguishes between "slowing down," "lapsing," and "lapsed" guests and offers each group something calibrated to their state produces materially better results than undifferentiated broadcasts.
• Not measuring lift correctly. As covered above: if you don't run a holdout group, you don't know whether your campaigns are driving behavior or measuring behavior that was going to happen anyway. The difference between correlation and causation in loyalty ROI reporting is the difference between a program that looks good and one that actually is.

5 Factors that Separate High-Performing Programs from Average Ones

The 2026 loyalty data indicates five factors top-performing programs have in common:

1. High enrollment rates. The ROI math only works when enough guests are in the program to produce statistically meaningful behavioral data and campaign reach. Paytronix's best clients achieve participation rates of 50 to 70%, versus an industry average closer to 20%. A brand with 10,000 active guests and a 20% enrollment rate has 2,000 addressable loyalty members. At 60% enrollment, it has 6,000. The marketing addressable audience, the campaign revenue, and the behavioral data are all three times larger.
2. Multi-channel enrollment. Enrollment happens where guests are, not where it's convenient for the operator. POS enrollment, app enrollment, web enrollment, kiosk enrollment, and even pump-side enrollment for c-stores each capture a different segment of the guest base. Programs requiring an app download lose the majority of potential enrollees before they've seen the value proposition.
3. Structured new-member activation. High-performing programs design the 90-day post-enrollment window explicitly, not reactively. A welcome message within two hours of first enrollment. A progress update at day 14 showing how far the member is from their first reward. A milestone bonus at visit three to accelerate the path to the fourth visit. None of this is complex. All of it is consequential.
4. AI-powered personalization. Restaurants using AI-powered personalization see up to 35% higher redemption rates compared to traditional segmentation approaches. The difference between a platform that sends the same offer to every guest in a lapsed segment and one that generates an individualized offer based on each guest's order history, channel preference, and predicted response shows up directly in campaign ROI.
5. A unified data model. The 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report points to stronger retention outcomes among operators that utilize multiple engagement channels and capabilities within a unified customer platform. Loyalty data alone predicts loyalty behavior. Loyalty data combined with online ordering behavior, app engagement, and payment patterns predicts guest lifetime value. The AI gets smarter as the data gets richer, and richer data requires a unified platform, not four separate tools with nightly syncs between them.

Benchmark Summary: Key Loyalty ROI Metrics

Metric	Industry Average	Strong Performance	Source
Program ROI	4.8x to 5.3x	Varies by program maturity	Antavo 2026 / Restroworks 2025
Member visit frequency lift	20% above non-members	2x above non-members (Sweetgreen 2025)	Circana / PYMNTS 2026
Member spend per visit	38% above non-members	Up to 50%+ in mature programs	Paytronix / Circana 2025
Annual spend (enrolled vs. not)	32% more annually	50%+ in high-CLV segments	Loyalty program research 2025
90-day active rate (average)	20–40%	66–72% (top segments per Paytronix)	Paytronix 2026 Loyalty Report
New member 4th-visit conversion	Below 50% (industry)	95% retention once 4 visits reached	Paytronix 2026 Loyalty Report
Programs reporting positive ROI	90–92.7%	N/A	Antavo 2026 / Restroworks 2025
Loyalty share of marketing budget	48% average	51.5% (benchmark leaders)	Antavo / Business Wire 2026

 

Source notes: All figures from sources cited in this article. Paytronix data from the 2026 Loyalty Report (800+ brands, 225M+ guest profiles). Industry averages reflect multiple independent research sources.

ROI by Restaurant Segment

The return profile of a loyalty program is not uniform across concepts. A QSR with daily traffic is building a different kind of ROI case than a full-service restaurant where the average guest visits four times a year.

• QSR and Fast Food. Visit frequency is the primary ROI driver. The program's job is to convert anonymous transactions into identified relationships and use behavioral data to protect visit frequency against competitors. With 52% of QSR customers already enrolled in at least one loyalty program, the cost of not having one is now measurable: you are competing against a retention tool every time a guest opens their phone. 74% of QSR and delivery brands report hitting their revenue goals, with 85% relying on mobile-friendly loyalty programs to drive engagement.
• Fast Casual. The clearest ROI case in the restaurant taxonomy. Visit frequency is high enough to generate rich behavioral data. Check sizes are meaningful enough to make the spend lift significant. The guest relationship has enough emotional dimension that personalization registers as care rather than marketing. AI-driven 1:1 campaigns produce the highest measured lift in this segment.
• Full Service. ROI here comes primarily from check size lift and occasion-driven visit frequency, not baseline frequency. A full-service loyalty member who visits four times per year versus twice per year has doubled their annual value to the brand, and a well-designed program with strong onboarding, birthday and anniversary campaigns, and VIP recognition can drive that frequency lift consistently. Customers with emotional connections to a restaurant brand spend 23% more annually than those with merely transactional relationships, and full-service programs are uniquely positioned to build that emotional connection through experiential rewards.
• C-Store and Fuel Retail. The highest-frequency segment and, by 2026 data, one of the most challenged on active rate due to rapid enrollment growth outpacing activation programs. The ROI case for c-store loyalty rests heavily on cross-category conversion: turning fuel-only customers into inside purchasers of food and prepared beverages, which carry dramatically higher margin than fuel transactions. A c-store loyalty member who adds one food purchase per week to their fueling stop generates materially more annual value than the fuel transaction data alone would predict.

Proprietary Research: What Paytronix Data Shows

The 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report identifies the first visit-to-fourth visit conversion as the defining performance gap between strong and average loyalty programs. Across the 800+ brands and 225 million guest profiles analyzed:

• First-time guests return less than half the time without intervention
• Brands with structured 90-day onboarding programs significantly outperform those without
• Once a member reaches four visits, the 95% long-term retention rate holds across segments and program types
• The gap between programs winning and losing on active rate is primarily a gap in new-member activation, not ongoing member engagement

"Getting them back a second time is where loyalty is either built or lost. Getting them back a fourth time is where regulars are made." 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report

Active Rate Data: Snack Concepts vs. Casual Dining

Snack concepts jumped 18% in active rate in 2025, nearly doubling their share of high-engagement members. Casual dining dipped below the 50% active rate benchmark for the first time, signaling programs that are enrolling members but not yet giving them a compelling enough reason to return.

The difference between those two trajectories is not concept type alone. It is program design. Snack concepts built for frequency have onboarding sequences, milestone rewards, and near-term redemption cycles that make the fourth visit feel imminent.

Casual dining programs often have longer reward cycles and less aggressive early-engagement communication, producing a mismatch between the program structure and the behavioral threshold that matters most.

Case Study: ChopShop

• Brand: ChopShop, a health-focused fast casual brand.
• Result: ChopShop saw a 21% increase in breakfast sales during a loyalty campaign run on the Paytronix platform.
• What it demonstrates: A loyalty campaign targeting a specific daypart produced a measurable sales lift in the hours that represent the brand's highest-margin opportunity. The campaign required behavioral segmentation to identify members most likely to add a morning visit and a targeted offer to give them a reason to try it. Neither is possible without a loyalty platform connected to transaction-level data.

 Case Study: Break Time

• Brand: Break Time, a convenience store chain.
• Result: Break Time drove a 25.6% increase in customer spend with a monthly rewards challenge powered by the Paytronix platform.
• What it demonstrates: A structured challenge mechanic, not a discount, drove a quarter-point increase in customer spend. The ROI of a challenge campaign is typically higher than a discount campaign because the offer cost is bounded and the behavioral change is habitual rather than transactional.

Frequently Asked Questions About Financial ROI from Loyalty Programs

Q: What is the average ROI of a restaurant loyalty program?

A: The average program ROI is 4.8x to 5.3x program cost, with 90 to 92.7% of operators reporting positive returns, per Antavo's Global Customer Loyalty Report 2026 and Restroworks data. The range reflects program maturity, enrollment rate, and how actively the program is managed.

First-year programs return less than established programs, and programs with structured onboarding and AI-powered personalization significantly outperform programs with neither.

Q: How much more do loyalty members spend than non-members?

A: Paytronix platform data shows members spend 38% more per visit than non-members. Circana's independent analysis confirms members visit 22% more frequently alongside that 38% spend lift. Across a full year, enrolled loyalty members spend an average of 32% more than non-members at the same restaurant.

Q: What is the Fourth Visit Principle?

A: The Fourth Visit Principle is a Paytronix research finding from the 2026 Loyalty Report, drawing on data from 225 million guest profiles. First-time guests return less than half the time. But once a member completes four visits, the return rate climbs to 95%.

The implication is direct: the goal of loyalty program design should not be enrollment. It should be accelerating new members to their fourth visit within the first 90 days, because that is where long-term retention is established.

Q: How do you measure the ROI of a restaurant loyalty program correctly?

A: Correctly measuring loyalty ROI requires a holdout group. Set aside 10 to 15% of your qualifying audience for any campaign, send them nothing, and compare their visit and spend behavior to the campaign group during the same period. The difference is your incremental lift.

Without a holdout, you are measuring activity, not causation. Most programs that report disappointing ROI are measuring the wrong thing, not running the wrong campaigns. Full ROI assessment, including the impact on churn reduction and customer lifetime value, usually requires six to 12 months of program data.

Q: What is a good active rate for a restaurant loyalty program?

A: Based on 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report benchmarks, an active rate above 50% within 90 days is solid performance. The top-performing segments in 2026 ran active rates of 66 to 72%.

An active rate below 30% signals a structural problem with onboarding, reward value, or communication frequency and should be addressed before optimizing for enrollment growth. Casual dining fell below 50% for the first time in 2026, a warning sign the segment is watching closely.

Q: How long does it take to see ROI from a loyalty program?

A: Enrollment and early engagement metrics appear within 30 to 60 days of launch. Meaningful data on frequency lift, average check impact, and redemption patterns typically emerges at the 90-day mark once enough guests have cycled through earning and redemption.

Full ROI assessment, including churn reduction and CLV impact, usually requires six to 12 months of data. Operators who evaluate programs at 60 days are making decisions on partial information. Budget 90 days before drawing conclusions and 12 months before making structural changes.

Q: Do loyalty programs work for small and independent restaurants?

A: Yes, and often more cost-effectively than operators expect. A restaurant with 200 active loyalty members who visit 22% more often generates meaningful incremental monthly revenue with no additional marketing spend beyond platform cost.

The math is favorable at small scale because the base cost of running a loyalty program has dropped significantly with modern platforms, while the behavioral lift from members is consistent regardless of restaurant size. The key constraint for independent restaurants is enrollment rate, not program ROI once members are enrolled.

Q: What is the biggest reason loyalty programs fail to produce ROI?

A: 72% of loyalty programs fail due to overly complicated rules, rewards that take too long to earn, no staff training, and ignoring non-loyalty customers. The most common single failure mode is treating enrollment as the goal rather than designing for the 90-day activation window that determines whether a new member becomes a regular.

Programs that enroll thousands of members but have no structured onboarding experience will show strong enrollment numbers and disappointing active rates, which is exactly the pattern visible in the casual dining and c-store segments in the 2026 data.

Taking the Next Step

The data in this article is a preview of what the full 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report contains. The complete report includes active rate benchmarks across all nine restaurant and c-store concepts, visit transition rate data by program maturity, CLV analysis by guest segment, and the strategies driving retention in the brands pulling ahead in 2026.

Download the 2026 Paytronix Loyalty Report: Get the full dataset: active rates, visit transitions, CLV by segment, Fourth Visit Principle findings, and the strategies driving retention across 800+ restaurant and c-store brands. 

See how Paytronix measures loyalty ROI for your brand: Request a demo built around your concept, your current program structure, and the specific ROI metrics your leadership team needs to see. 

Sources

1. Paytronix. 2026 Loyalty Report: Capturing Deeper Guest Loyalty in the Experience Economy. April 2026. paytronix.com/resources/reports/annual-loyalty-report
2. Paytronix. 2026 Loyalty Report: Real-Time Personalization and AI-Powered Decisioning Drive Success. GlobeNewswire, April 2026. globenewswire.com
3. Paytronix. Loyalty Programs Must Drive Repeat Visits, Not Just Sign-Ups. Via Mobility Plaza, April 2026. mobilityplaza.org
4. Paytronix. Paytronix Finds Personalization Drives Loyalty Success. Convenience Store News, April 2026. csnews.com
5. Paytronix. Paytronix Turns Guest Data Into Loyalty, Personalized Engagement and Restaurant Revenue Growth. Restaurant Technology News, June 2026. restauranttechnologynews.com
6. Paytronix. 7 Stats Showing the Effectiveness of Loyalty Programs. Blog, April 2026. paytronix.com/blog
7. Antavo. Global Customer Loyalty Report 2026. 2026. antavo.com
8. Restroworks. Restaurant Loyalty Program Statistics: Customer Engagement and App Usage Data. September 2025. restroworks.com
9. Access Development. Loyalty and Discount Program Trends and Statistics for 2026. April 2026. blog.accessdevelopment.com
10. LoyaltyPass. Restaurant Loyalty Statistics 2026: Key Data. April 2026. loyaltypass.co
11. Circana / Nation's Restaurant News. Restaurant Loyalty Traffic Data 2025 and 2026. 2025 and 2026. nrn.com
12. Voucherify. 25 Essential QSR Loyalty Trends and Statistics. January 2026. voucherify.io
13. iOrders. Restaurant Loyalty Program Trends and Statistics for 2025. iorders.ca
14. Talon.One. The Secret Sauce for a Winning Restaurant Loyalty Program. April 2026. talon.one
15. Welcome Back. Restaurant Loyalty Program ROI: Real Numbers 2026. April 2026. welcomeback.io
16. Evokad. Restaurant Customer Retention Strategies That Drive ROI. January 2026. evokad.com
17. National Restaurant Association. State of the Industry 2025. 2025. restaurant.org
18. McKinsey. Restaurant Industry Report. January 2026. mckinsey.com